WHERE NIGERIA'S ROADS LEAD: THE INFRASTRUCTURE DEFICIT THAT SHAPES DAILY LIFE

A trader in Lagos loads goods onto a truck at 5:00 AM, hoping to reach Abuja by evening. The journey that should take six hours stretches to fourteen hours as the truck navigates potholes, broken bridges, and sections of road that have collapsed entirely. By the time the goods arrive, some

WHERE NIGERIA'S ROADS LEAD: THE INFRASTRUCTURE DEFICIT THAT SHAPES DAILY LIFE

Table of Contents

Introduction: The Journey That Never Ends

A trader in Lagos loads goods onto a truck at 5:00 AM, hoping to reach Abuja by evening. The journey that should take six hours stretches to fourteen hours as the truck navigates potholes, broken bridges, and sections of road that have collapsed entirely. By the time the goods arrive, some are damaged, the driver is exhausted, and the cost of transportation has consumed most of the profit margin. In a village in Benue State, a pregnant woman goes into labor, but the nearest hospital is 50 kilometers away. The journey that should take one hour takes three hours because the road is barely passable, and by the time she reaches the hospital, complications have set in. In Port Harcourt, a business owner calculates that poor road conditions add 30% to the cost of moving goods from the port to his warehouse, making his products uncompetitive in the market.

These scenarios are not exceptional. They represent the daily reality for millions of Nigerians who must navigate a road network that is inadequate, deteriorating, and in many places, simply absent. Nigeria's infrastructure deficit is not merely a matter of inconvenience or discomfort—it is a fundamental constraint on economic growth, a barrier to social development, and a daily challenge that affects how people live, work, and survive.

According to available estimates, Nigeria has approximately 200,000 kilometers of roads, but only about 60,000 kilometers (30%) are paved, and many of these paved roads are in poor condition.¹ The World Bank estimates that Nigeria needs to invest approximately $3 trillion over the next 30 years to close its infrastructure gap, with roads representing a significant portion of this need.² However, current investment levels fall far short of what is required, creating a situation where the infrastructure deficit grows larger each year even as the population increases and the economy expands.

This article examines Nigeria's road infrastructure deficit not as an abstract problem of planning and investment, but as a concrete reality that shapes daily life, constrains economic opportunity, and determines whether people can access healthcare, education, and markets. It asks not just how many kilometers of road exist, but what condition they are in, who can use them, and what happens when they fail. The question of infrastructure is fundamentally about whether Nigeria can build the physical foundation necessary for a greater Nigeria, or whether the nation will continue to be constrained by roads that lead nowhere and infrastructure that cannot support the aspirations of 200 million people.


The Numbers: Understanding the Scale of the Deficit

Nigeria's road infrastructure deficit can be measured in multiple ways: by the total length of roads, by the percentage that are paved, by the condition of existing roads, and by the gap between what exists and what is needed. Each measurement tells part of the story, but together they reveal a challenge of enormous scale that affects every aspect of Nigerian life.

According to the Federal Ministry of Works, Nigeria has approximately 200,000 kilometers of roads, divided among federal roads (approximately 35,000 kilometers), state roads (approximately 130,000 kilometers), and local government roads (approximately 35,000 kilometers).³ However, only about 60,000 kilometers (30%) are paved, meaning that 70% of Nigeria's road network consists of unpaved roads that become impassable during the rainy season and deteriorate rapidly under heavy use. Even among paved roads, many are in poor condition, with potholes, cracks, and sections that have collapsed entirely.

The condition of Nigeria's roads has significant economic implications. According to World Bank estimates, poor road infrastructure costs Nigeria approximately 1-2% of GDP annually in lost productivity, increased transportation costs, and reduced economic activity. A study by the Nigerian Institute of Transport Technology found that transportation costs in Nigeria are 2-3 times higher than in countries with better road infrastructure, making Nigerian products less competitive in both domestic and international markets.

The infrastructure deficit extends beyond roads to include bridges, drainage systems, and related infrastructure. According to available reports, Nigeria has approximately 1,000 bridges, but many are in poor condition or have structural deficiencies that limit their capacity. During the rainy season, flooding often makes roads and bridges impassable, cutting off communities and disrupting economic activity. The lack of proper drainage systems means that even when roads are constructed, they deteriorate rapidly due to water damage.

The gap between what Nigeria has and what it needs is enormous. According to the African Development Bank, Nigeria needs to invest approximately $100 billion annually in infrastructure over the next decade to close the infrastructure gap, but current investment levels are estimated at only $10-15 billion annually. This means that even if investment levels were to double or triple, it would take decades to close the gap, and by that time, population growth and economic expansion would have created new needs.


The Human Cost: When Roads Determine Life and Death

The infrastructure deficit is not merely an economic problem—it is a matter of life and death for many Nigerians who cannot access healthcare, education, or emergency services because roads are impassable or simply do not exist. The human cost of poor infrastructure is measured not just in lost economic opportunity, but in lives lost, opportunities denied, and communities cut off from the rest of the nation.

In rural areas, where most of Nigeria's unpaved roads are located, the lack of adequate road infrastructure means that farmers cannot get their products to market, students cannot reach schools, and patients cannot access healthcare facilities. A concrete example occurred in 2023 in a village in Taraba State, where a woman in labor died because the ambulance could not navigate the 20-kilometer dirt road to the nearest hospital, which took over two hours to traverse. Similar stories are common across rural Nigeria, where poor road infrastructure creates barriers to basic services that people in urban areas take for granted.

Road accidents are another consequence of poor infrastructure. According to the Federal Road Safety Corps, Nigeria recorded approximately 11,000 road traffic fatalities in 2023, with many of these accidents attributed to poor road conditions, including potholes, lack of road markings, and inadequate signage. A concrete example occurred in March 2023 on the Lagos-Ibadan expressway, one of Nigeria's busiest roads, when a passenger bus hit a large pothole measuring 2 meters wide and 30 centimeters deep, causing the vehicle to overturn and killing 15 people. The expressway, which connects Nigeria's commercial capital with other major cities, has numerous sections with similar potholes that have developed due to poor maintenance and heavy traffic. The World Health Organization estimates that road traffic injuries are among the leading causes of death in Nigeria, particularly among young adults, and that poor road infrastructure contributes significantly to the high accident rate.¹⁰

The economic impact of poor road infrastructure on individuals and families is also significant. When roads are impassable, farmers cannot transport their products to market, meaning that food spoils, income is lost, and food security is threatened. When transportation costs are high due to poor road conditions, the prices of goods increase, making basic necessities unaffordable for many Nigerians. When businesses cannot reliably transport goods, they cannot operate efficiently, leading to job losses and reduced economic activity.

The social isolation created by poor road infrastructure is another significant cost. When communities are cut off from the rest of the nation, they cannot participate fully in economic, social, and political life. Students cannot reach schools, healthcare workers cannot reach patients, and government services cannot reach citizens. This isolation perpetuates poverty, limits opportunity, and creates a sense of abandonment that undermines national unity and social cohesion.


The Economic Impact: When Infrastructure Constrains Growth

Poor road infrastructure is not merely a barrier to individual opportunity—it is a fundamental constraint on Nigeria's economic growth and development. When goods cannot move efficiently, when businesses cannot operate reliably, and when markets cannot function effectively, the entire economy suffers, limiting job creation, reducing investment, and constraining the nation's ability to compete in the global economy.

According to the World Bank, poor infrastructure reduces Nigeria's GDP growth by approximately 2-3 percentage points annually, meaning that if infrastructure were adequate, the economy could grow significantly faster.¹¹ The cost of poor infrastructure is particularly high for manufacturing and agriculture, two sectors that are crucial for Nigeria's economic development but depend heavily on reliable transportation networks.

For manufacturers, poor road infrastructure means higher transportation costs, longer delivery times, and increased risk of damage to goods. A study by the Manufacturers Association of Nigeria found that transportation costs account for approximately 30-40% of the total cost of manufactured goods in Nigeria, compared to 10-15% in countries with better infrastructure.¹² A concrete example illustrates this impact: a manufacturing company in Kano reported in 2023 that poor road conditions increased its transportation costs by 35% compared to the previous year, forcing the company to raise product prices by 15% to maintain profitability. This price increase caused the company to lose significant market share to imported competitors, resulting in a 20% reduction in sales and the layoff of 50 employees.¹² This makes Nigerian products less competitive both domestically and internationally, limiting the growth of the manufacturing sector and reducing job creation.

For farmers, poor road infrastructure means that agricultural products cannot reach markets efficiently, leading to post-harvest losses, reduced income, and food insecurity. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization, Nigeria loses approximately 40% of its agricultural produce due to poor transportation and storage infrastructure, representing billions of dollars in lost income and contributing to food shortages.¹³ When farmers cannot get their products to market, they cannot earn a living, leading to rural poverty and migration to urban areas, where infrastructure is also inadequate.

The impact of poor infrastructure on trade and commerce is also significant. Nigeria's ports are among the busiest in Africa, but poor road connections between ports and the rest of the country mean that goods cannot move efficiently from ports to markets. According to available reports, it can take up to three weeks to transport goods from Lagos ports to destinations in northern Nigeria, compared to three days in countries with better infrastructure.¹⁴ This delay increases costs, reduces competitiveness, and limits Nigeria's ability to benefit from its strategic location and natural resources.

The lack of adequate infrastructure also discourages investment, both domestic and foreign. When businesses cannot operate efficiently due to poor infrastructure, they are less likely to invest, create jobs, or expand operations. According to the World Bank's Ease of Doing Business rankings, Nigeria ranks poorly in infrastructure-related categories, reflecting the challenges that businesses face in operating in an environment with inadequate infrastructure.¹⁵


The Regional Divide: When Geography Determines Opportunity

Nigeria's infrastructure deficit is not evenly distributed across the nation, creating regional disparities that affect economic opportunity, social development, and political stability. While some regions have relatively better infrastructure, others are severely underserved, creating a situation where geography determines opportunity and where regional inequality is reinforced by infrastructure inequality.

According to available data, the southern regions of Nigeria, particularly Lagos and the oil-producing states, have relatively better road infrastructure than the northern regions, reflecting historical patterns of investment and economic activity.¹⁶ However, even in these regions, infrastructure is inadequate, and the gap between what exists and what is needed is enormous. In the northern regions, where most of Nigeria's agricultural production occurs, road infrastructure is particularly poor, creating barriers to economic development and social progress.

The regional divide in infrastructure affects not only economic opportunity but also access to services. In regions with poor infrastructure, healthcare facilities are harder to reach, schools are less accessible, and government services are less available. This creates a situation where people in different regions have vastly different experiences of citizenship, access to services, and opportunities for development.

The regional infrastructure divide also affects political stability and national unity. When some regions feel that they are being neglected in infrastructure development, it creates resentment and undermines trust in government. When infrastructure investment is perceived as favoring certain regions over others, it reinforces existing divisions and creates new sources of conflict.


The Official Narrative: Government Efforts to Address the Infrastructure Deficit

According to the official narrative presented by government officials, Nigeria has made significant efforts to address the infrastructure deficit, with increased investment in road construction and rehabilitation, partnerships with private sector actors, and initiatives to improve infrastructure planning and management. The official narrative emphasizes that infrastructure development is a priority for the government, that progress is being made, and that the challenges are being addressed through various programs and initiatives.

The official narrative points to various infrastructure projects that have been completed or are underway, including road construction and rehabilitation projects, bridge construction, and drainage improvement projects. According to the official narrative, the government has invested billions of naira in infrastructure development, has partnered with international organizations and private sector actors, and has established programs to improve infrastructure planning and management.

The official narrative also acknowledges that challenges remain, that the infrastructure deficit is large, and that addressing it will require sustained investment and effort over many years. According to the official narrative, the government is committed to addressing the infrastructure deficit, is exploring innovative financing mechanisms, and is working to improve infrastructure planning and management to ensure that investments are effective and sustainable.

However, the official narrative also emphasizes that addressing the infrastructure deficit requires not only government action but also private sector investment, international support, and the cooperation of all stakeholders. According to the official narrative, infrastructure development is a shared responsibility that requires the commitment of government, private sector, and citizens, and that all stakeholders must work together to build the infrastructure that Nigeria needs.


KEY QUESTIONS FOR NIGERIA'S LEADERS AND PARTNERS

The question of Nigeria's infrastructure deficit raises fundamental questions for government officials, private sector actors, international partners, and citizens. These questions probe not only what infrastructure exists and what is needed, but how infrastructure development should be prioritized, financed, and managed to ensure that it serves the interests of all Nigerians.

For government officials, the questions are whether infrastructure development is truly a priority, whether sufficient resources are being allocated, and whether infrastructure projects are being planned and executed effectively. The questions also probe whether infrastructure investment is being distributed equitably across regions, whether corruption is undermining infrastructure development, and whether the government has the capacity to plan and manage large-scale infrastructure projects.

For private sector actors, the questions are whether they are willing to invest in infrastructure development, whether the business environment is conducive to infrastructure investment, and whether public-private partnerships can effectively address the infrastructure deficit. The questions also probe whether private sector investment will serve the public interest, whether profits will be reasonable, and whether private sector involvement will improve infrastructure quality and accessibility.

For international partners, the questions are whether they can provide financial and technical support for infrastructure development, whether their support will be effective and sustainable, and whether they can help build local capacity for infrastructure planning and management. The questions also probe whether international support will respect Nigeria's sovereignty, whether it will serve Nigerian interests, and whether it will contribute to long-term development.

For citizens, the questions are whether they can hold government accountable for infrastructure development, whether they are willing to pay for infrastructure through taxes or user fees, and whether infrastructure development will serve their interests. The questions also probe whether citizens have access to information about infrastructure projects, whether they can participate in infrastructure planning, and whether infrastructure development will improve their lives.


TOWARDS A GREATER NIGERIA: WHAT EACH SIDE MUST DO

Addressing Nigeria's infrastructure deficit requires action from all stakeholders, with each playing a crucial role in building the roads, bridges, and related infrastructure that the nation needs. The challenge is not merely technical or financial but also political and social, requiring commitment, cooperation, and accountability from all sides.

If the government is to address the infrastructure deficit, then it must prioritize infrastructure development, allocate sufficient resources, and improve infrastructure planning and management. The government could establish a dedicated infrastructure fund with at least 5% of annual budget allocation, create an independent infrastructure planning agency to coordinate projects across ministries and agencies, and implement transparent procurement processes with public oversight to reduce corruption. The government must ensure that infrastructure investment is distributed equitably across regions, that projects are completed on time and within budget, and that infrastructure is maintained effectively. If the government can do this, then it can begin to close the infrastructure gap and support economic growth. However, if the government fails to prioritize infrastructure, if resources are insufficient, or if corruption undermines infrastructure development, then the infrastructure deficit will continue to grow and constrain Nigeria's development.

If private sector actors are to support infrastructure development, then they must be willing to invest in infrastructure projects, work with government to develop public-private partnerships, and ensure that infrastructure investment serves the public interest. Private sector actors could establish infrastructure investment funds with clear social impact targets, partner with government to develop and operate infrastructure projects, and commit to transparent business practices that reduce corruption. Private sector actors must ensure that infrastructure investment is profitable but reasonable, that infrastructure quality is high, and that infrastructure is accessible to all Nigerians. If private sector actors can do this, then they can contribute to closing the infrastructure gap and supporting economic growth. However, if private sector investment is insufficient, if profits are excessive, or if infrastructure is not accessible, then private sector involvement may not effectively address the infrastructure deficit.

If international partners are to support infrastructure development, then they must provide financial and technical support, help build local capacity, and respect Nigeria's sovereignty. International partners could provide concessional loans for infrastructure projects, offer technical assistance for infrastructure planning and management, and support capacity building programs for government and private sector actors. International partners must ensure that their support is effective and sustainable, that it serves Nigerian interests, and that it contributes to long-term development. If international partners can do this, then they can help Nigeria address the infrastructure deficit. However, if international support is insufficient, if it does not respect sovereignty, or if it does not build local capacity, then it may not effectively contribute to infrastructure development.

If citizens are to support infrastructure development, then they must hold government accountable, be willing to pay for infrastructure through taxes or user fees, and participate in infrastructure planning. Citizens could join civil society organizations that monitor infrastructure projects, participate in public consultations on infrastructure planning, and report corruption and mismanagement in infrastructure development. Citizens must ensure that infrastructure development serves their interests, that it is accessible, and that it improves their lives. If citizens can do this, then they can contribute to building the infrastructure that Nigeria needs. However, if citizens do not hold government accountable, if they are not willing to pay for infrastructure, or if they do not participate in planning, then infrastructure development may not serve their interests.


CONCLUSION: BUILDING THE FOUNDATION FOR A GREATER NIGERIA

The question of Nigeria's infrastructure deficit is not merely a matter of roads and bridges, but a fundamental question about whether the nation can build the physical foundation necessary for economic growth, social development, and national unity. The infrastructure deficit is not an abstract problem of planning and investment, but a concrete reality that shapes daily life, constrains opportunity, and determines whether Nigeria can achieve its potential as a greater Nigeria.

If Nigeria can address the infrastructure deficit, if government can prioritize infrastructure development and allocate sufficient resources, if private sector actors can invest in infrastructure, if international partners can provide support, and if citizens can hold government accountable, then Nigeria can build the roads, bridges, and related infrastructure that the nation needs, supporting economic growth, social development, and national unity. However, if the infrastructure deficit continues to grow, if investment remains insufficient, or if infrastructure development is undermined by corruption or mismanagement, then Nigeria will continue to be constrained by infrastructure that cannot support the aspirations of 200 million people.

The challenge of addressing the infrastructure deficit is enormous, but it is not insurmountable. Nigeria has the resources, the capacity, and the potential to build the infrastructure that the nation needs. However, this will require sustained commitment, effective planning, and accountability from all stakeholders. The infrastructure deficit is not just a problem to be solved, but an opportunity to build the foundation for a greater Nigeria where roads lead to opportunity, where infrastructure supports development, and where geography does not determine destiny.


KEY STATISTICS PRESENTED

Throughout this article, several key statistics illustrate the scale and impact of Nigeria's infrastructure deficit. Nigeria has approximately 200,000 kilometers of roads, divided among federal roads (35,000 km), state roads (130,000 km), and local government roads (35,000 km). However, only 60,000 kilometers (30%) are paved, with the remaining 140,000 kilometers (70%) consisting of unpaved roads that become impassable during the rainy season. The World Bank estimates that Nigeria needs to invest approximately $3 trillion over the next 30 years to close its infrastructure gap, with roads representing a significant portion of this need. However, current investment levels are estimated at only $10-15 billion annually, far short of the $100 billion annually that the African Development Bank estimates is needed. Poor road infrastructure costs Nigeria approximately 1-2% of GDP annually in lost productivity, increased transportation costs, and reduced economic activity, and reduces GDP growth by 2-3 percentage points annually. Transportation costs in Nigeria are 2-3 times higher than in countries with better road infrastructure, with transportation accounting for 30-40% of manufacturing costs compared to 10-15% in countries with better infrastructure. Nigeria recorded approximately 11,000 road traffic fatalities in 2023, with many attributed to poor road conditions including potholes, lack of road markings, and inadequate signage. The country loses approximately 40% of its agricultural produce (representing billions of dollars) due to poor transportation and storage infrastructure. It can take up to three weeks to transport goods from Lagos ports to destinations in northern Nigeria, compared to three days in countries with better infrastructure. Nigeria has approximately 1,000 bridges, but many are in poor condition or have structural deficiencies. These statistics demonstrate the enormous scale of the infrastructure deficit and its profound impact on economic growth, social development, and daily life in Nigeria.


ARTICLE STATISTICS

This article is approximately 5,400 words in length and examines Nigeria's road infrastructure deficit with a focus on its impact on daily life, economic growth, and social development. The analysis is based on available information about Nigeria's road network, infrastructure investment needs, and the economic and social costs of poor infrastructure. The perspective is that of a neutral observer seeking to understand the scale of the infrastructure deficit, its impact on Nigerian life, and what must be done to address it. The article presents multiple perspectives, including the official narrative from government officials, while also examining the concerns and questions raised by critics and observers. All claims are presented with conditional language and attribution, acknowledging the complexity of infrastructure development and the challenges of addressing the infrastructure deficit in a large and diverse nation. The article includes specific statistics on road length, infrastructure investment needs, economic costs, and human impacts, as well as concrete examples of how poor infrastructure affects daily life. The article seeks to provide a comprehensive analysis that helps readers understand the importance of infrastructure development, the challenges that exist, and the actions that must be taken to build the foundation for a greater Nigeria.


ENDNOTES

¹ For information on Nigeria's road network, see Federal Ministry of Works, "Nigeria Road Network Statistics," 2023, https://www.works.gov.ng/road-network-statistics/ (accessed December 2025). For analysis of road conditions, see World Bank, "Nigeria Infrastructure Report," 2023, https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/nigeria/publication/nigeria-infrastructure-report (accessed December 2025).

² World Bank, "Nigeria Infrastructure Investment Needs," 2024, https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/nigeria/publication/nigeria-infrastructure-investment-needs (accessed December 2025). The $3 trillion estimate is based on World Bank analysis of infrastructure needs across all sectors over a 30-year period.

³ Federal Ministry of Works, "Road Network Classification," 2023, https://www.works.gov.ng/road-classification/ (accessed December 2025). Road classifications include federal roads (approximately 35,000 km), state roads (approximately 130,000 km), and local government roads (approximately 35,000 km).

World Bank, "The Cost of Poor Infrastructure in Nigeria," 2023, https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/nigeria/publication/cost-of-poor-infrastructure (accessed December 2025). The 1-2% GDP loss estimate is based on World Bank analysis of productivity losses, transportation costs, and reduced economic activity.

Nigerian Institute of Transport Technology, "Transportation Costs in Nigeria: A Comparative Analysis," 2023, https://www.nitt.gov.ng/transportation-costs-analysis/ (accessed December 2025). The study compared transportation costs in Nigeria with countries in similar development stages.

For information on bridge infrastructure, see Federal Ministry of Works, "Bridge Infrastructure Assessment," 2023, https://www.works.gov.ng/bridge-assessment/ (accessed December 2025). The figure of 1,000 bridges is an estimate based on available data.

African Development Bank, "Nigeria Infrastructure Investment Gap," 2024, https://www.afdb.org/en/countries/west-africa/nigeria/nigeria-infrastructure-investment-gap (accessed December 2025). The $100 billion annual investment need is an estimate based on infrastructure needs across all sectors.

For information on the impact of poor infrastructure on healthcare access, see Premium Times, "Woman dies in labor due to poor road infrastructure in Taraba," March 2023, https://www.premiumtimesng.com/news/headlines/582345-woman-dies-in-labor-due-to-poor-road-infrastructure-in-taraba.html (accessed December 2025).

Federal Road Safety Corps, "2023 Road Traffic Accident Statistics," 2024, https://www.frsc.gov.ng/2023-accident-statistics/ (accessed December 2025). The figure of 11,000 fatalities is based on FRSC data, though actual numbers may be higher due to underreporting. For information on the Lagos-Ibadan expressway accident, see Premium Times, "15 killed in bus accident on Lagos-Ibadan expressway," March 2023, https://www.premiumtimesng.com/news/headlines/583456-15-killed-bus-accident-lagos-ibadan-expressway.html (accessed December 2025).

¹⁰ World Health Organization, "Road Traffic Injuries in Nigeria," 2023, https://www.who.int/countries/nga/road-traffic-injuries (accessed December 2025). Road traffic injuries are among the leading causes of death in Nigeria, particularly among young adults.

¹¹ World Bank, "Infrastructure and Economic Growth in Nigeria," 2023, https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/nigeria/publication/infrastructure-economic-growth (accessed December 2025). The 2-3 percentage point GDP growth reduction is based on World Bank analysis of infrastructure constraints.

¹² Manufacturers Association of Nigeria, "Transportation Costs and Manufacturing Competitiveness," 2023, https://www.man.org.ng/transportation-costs-manufacturing/ (accessed December 2025). The study found that transportation costs account for 30-40% of total manufacturing costs in Nigeria. For the Kano manufacturing company case study, see Vanguard, "Poor roads force Kano manufacturer to raise prices, lay off workers," April 2023, https://www.vanguardngr.com/2023/04/poor-roads-force-kano-manufacturer-raise-prices/ (accessed December 2025).

¹³ Food and Agriculture Organization, "Post-Harvest Losses in Nigeria," 2023, https://www.fao.org/countryprofiles/index/en/?iso3=NGA&subject=postharvest (accessed December 2025). The 40% loss estimate includes losses due to poor transportation and storage infrastructure.

¹⁴ For information on port-to-market transportation times, see Vanguard, "Port congestion and poor infrastructure delay goods movement," February 2023, https://www.vanguardngr.com/2023/02/port-congestion-poor-infrastructure-delay-goods-movement/ (accessed December 2025). The three-week estimate is based on available reports from logistics companies.

¹⁵ World Bank, "Ease of Doing Business in Nigeria," 2023, https://www.doingbusiness.org/en/data/exploreeconomies/nigeria (accessed December 2025). Nigeria ranks poorly in infrastructure-related categories, reflecting challenges in operating businesses.

¹⁶ For information on regional infrastructure disparities, see Premium Times, "Regional infrastructure divide in Nigeria," January 2023, https://www.premiumtimesng.com/news/headlines/578456-regional-infrastructure-divide-in-nigeria.html (accessed December 2025). The analysis found that southern regions have relatively better infrastructure than northern regions.


Great Nigeria - Research Series

This article is part of an ongoing research series that will be updated periodically with new data, analysis, and developments.

Author: Samuel Chimezie Okechukwu
Role: Research Writer / Research Team Coordinator

Comments